Note that all of those tools not only keep the source closed but also have a proprietary note format.įor the context, I am a paying user of Dynalist Pro (I am assuming = Erica at, thank you for Dynalist!) and I am making small donations to for that exact reason: I want to know if the company loses interest in the project (either financial or just sells the company), I will not be left with a broken workflow. I want the same for Obsidian (both because I am rooting for and and because I want the tool I will use for many years to be sustainable and supported). Everyone lecturing on how to develop a product should look at Evernote, Notion, and Roam, which seem to be doing well. I am happy to pay for Obsidian if I find it to fit well into my workflow. I think the discussion has drifted a bit so I wanted to post a reply specifically supporting this option ( does not mention anything yet.). I think having a privacy statement and a pledge to open up code access if Obsidian discontinues are good ideas, but open sourcing does not make sense given the current circumstances. There are business models that rely and operate on open source but the concept or practice of open source itself, is not a business model. I don’t know a great deal about them (so maybe the comparison would break down at some point) but they’ve certainly been around for while, are focused on longevity, and provide a free and open source note / kb application while operating within a commercial business context (albeit the StandardNotes model provides different services than Obsidian’s). Perhaps there are things they can learn from one another but there’s no sense comparing them as commercial business models since only one of the two fit that description.Īn interesting comparison that might be apt however, would probably be something like Standard Notes ( ). Yes, people can spend the night in both however the scenario and goals of each establishment are completely different. I would argue that it’s akin to discussing how to make money from running a hotel and claiming that a community homeless shelter proves you can’t make money by offering people a place to sleep. Zotero is a free, easy-to-use tool to help you collect, organize, annotate, cite, and share your research sources.Sorry, it’s not clear to me what the rationale could be for comparing Zettlr as a commercial entity. Community plugins list, theme list, and releases of Obsidian. The personal knowledge management (PKM) tool that grows as you do! The world’s fastest framework for building websites. □A simple and elegant markdown editor, available for Linux, macOS and Windows. Build your personal knowledge base with Trilium Notes A template Obsidian Vault for storing your OSCP revision notes A command line python script to convert Obsidian md files to a pdf Use it to organize your todo list, to write your journals, or to record your unique life. A local-first, non-linear, outliner notebook for organizing and sharing your personal knowledge base. Pandoc document export plugin for Obsidian () When comparing Zettlr and obsidian-export you can also consider the following projects: New User - Should I stay with pure markdown or use Obsidian extra commands/syntax?.I make heavy use of transclusion !] to keep it a bit more elegant and some custom styles are needed to make it how it look how I wish. The /communications and /sessions folders can contain info with links to /elements that are revealed as needed. Regardless, the /elements folder contains all the lore chunks of the world including information I keep on the PCs. I am playing with using () to see if it offers more control/flexibility. I then build html pages using () to control the information that is revealed to players. Additionally, I have had reasonable success using () to export my Obsidian vault to CommonMark.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |